SynthesisClinical oral investigations2024
Platelet-rich fibrin as a hemostatic agent in dental extractions in patients taking anticoagulants or antiplatelet medication: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of platelet-rich fibrin on microperfusion during early socket healing: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Dual-Network Protein Hydrogels Promote Rapid Hemostasis and Immune-Regulated Scarless Tissue Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Autologous whole blood clot formation with actigraft in patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an ex vivo feasibility study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Local Hemostasis as the Critical Enabler for Safe Antithrombotic Therapy in Dentistry-Navigating Future Frontiers and Innovative Concepts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Hemostasis and Gingival Healing-Polyurethane Adhesive Postextraction Under Rivaroxaban Therapy in a Rodent Model.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to evaluate whether platelet-rich-fibrin (PRF) is effective in preventing postoperative bleeding after dental extractions in patients on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy compared to stitches alone and different hemostatic agents. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis systematic review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42024562289). Two authors independently performed searches in several databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS.
resultsIn total, 789 studies were identified, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria after full-text screening. Four studies evaluated the efficiency of PRF in patients on antiplatelet therapy, and seven studies analyzed its hemostatic effect in patients on anticoagulants. All studies showed sufficient hemostasis when PRF was used, but due to heterogeneity meta-analysis was not possible.
conclusionsDespite the use of different protocols and control groups, PRF treatment seems to be superior to only stitches and inferior to chitosan dressings concerning the time of hemostasis. Additionally, PRF seems to be beneficial in terms of faster wound healing and less postoperative pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PRF is known to enhance soft tissue healing and reduce postoperative pain. As a fully autologous platelet concentrate, it can support hemostasis after dental extractions in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. This systematic review aims to provide an update of the existing literature on PRF and its hemostatic capacity in patients with blood thinning medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.