Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387904›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Psychometric properties of the preschool strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in UK 1-to-2-year-olds.

Elizabeth M Byrne, Annette Eneberi, Beth Barker, Ellen Grimas, Jane Iles, Helen Pote, Paul G Ramchandani, Christine M O'Farrelly

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth M ByrneSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. elizabeth.byrne@uea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5018-5643
Annette EneberiRoyal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-3417
Beth BarkerFaculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ellen GrimasSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5952-8622
Jane IlesSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3602-9898
Helen PoteRoyal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-1931
Paul G RamchandaniFaculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3646-2410
Christine M O'FarrellyFaculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cmo41@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-6564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of emotional and behavioural difficulties in very young children is crucial for intervention and prevention. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used measure of child and adolescent mental health that is brief, cost-effective, and easy to administer. The aims of this study were to establish the validity and reliability of the preschool SDQ in UK 1-2-year-olds. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Preschool SDQ in a large UK sample (N = 2040; female = 46.86%; male = 50.83%, sex not recorded = 2.30%) of infants and toddlers (1-2-year-olds). Analyses were performed at item-level (internal consistency, internal structure, measurement invariance) and scale-level (test-retest reliability, convergent validity). Similar to previous research, confirmatory factor analysis supported a slightly modified five-factor model, including the addition of a positive construal method factor, resulting in satisfactory data fit and a moderately good fitting model. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the SDQ total difficulties score was satisfactory, and higher for externalising over internalising problems. Moderate to strong correlations indicated good test-retest reliability, and moderate correlations indicated convergent validity between the SDQ and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), but associations were weaker than those found in studies with older children.

conclusionsThe SDQ demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, suggesting that it may be a useful tool for the detection of early mental health difficulties, particularly externalising symptoms, even in very young toddlers. Further research is needed to validate the SDQ in younger populations and to establish cut-off scores for clinical interpretation. The implications of these findings are discussed. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Clinically significant emotional and behavioural problems can and do emerge in early toddlerhood. • Parenting interventions can reduce mental health problems. • Valid, reliable, brief, and affordable tools are needed to identify very young children who may benefit from such support. WHAT IS NEW: • The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire was found to have acceptable factor structure and psychometric properties for use with young children aged 1-2 years old in the UK. • The externalising subscale in particular shows promise as an early screening tool.

Indexed as

Child Behavior DisordersPsychometricsChild, PreschoolFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansInfantMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomEmotional and behavioural problemsPreschoolStrengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID39387904
PMCPMC11527971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.