Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387867›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024

Partitioning of Neutral PFAS in Homes and Release to the Outdoor Environment: Results from the IPA Campaign.

Clara M A Eichler, Naomi Y Chang, Daniel E Amparo, Elaine A Cohen Hubal, Jason D Surratt, Glenn C Morrison, Barbara J Turpin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The impact of particle size on PFAS concentrations in dust from homes in North Carolina and New York and implications for exposure.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Elevated PFAS Precursors in Septage and Residential Pump Stations.Environmental science & technology letters · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clara M A EichlerDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1282-3608
Naomi Y ChangDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Daniel E AmparoDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Elaine A Cohen HubalU.S. EPA, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27709, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9650-3483
Jason D SurrattDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6833-1450
Glenn C MorrisonDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6876-7185
Barbara J TurpinDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4513-4187

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution and fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in homes are not well understood. To address this, we measured nine neutral PFAS in dust, airborne particles, dryer lint, and on heating and air conditioning (HAC) filters in 11 homes in North Carolina as part of the Indoor PFAS Assessment (IPA) Campaign and compared them with concurrently collected gas and cloth measurements. Fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) contributed most (≥75%) to total (∑) measured neutral PFAS concentrations in dust, HAC filter, and dryer lint samples, with mean ∑(FTOH) concentrations of 207 ng/g, 549 ng/g, and 84 ng/g, respectively. In particles, perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanols (FOSEs) dominated, with a mean ∑(FOSE) concentration of 0.28 ng/m

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental MonitoringFluorocarbonsAir PollutantsDustHousingNorth CarolinaAir PollutantsDustFluorocarbonsdistributionemission ratesindoor exposureper- and polyfluoroalkyl substancesresidentialsinkssorption

Identifiers

PMID39387867
PMCPMC11996290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.