Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387832›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Hyperparameter selection for dataset-constrained semantic segmentation: Practical machine learning optimization.

Chris Boyd, Gregory C Brown, Timothy J Kleinig, Wolfgang Mayer, Joseph Dawson, Mark Jenkinson, Eva Bezak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chris BoydAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6443-0147
Gregory C BrownAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Timothy J KleinigDepartment of Neurology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Wolfgang MayerDiscipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Joseph DawsonDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Mark JenkinsonAustralian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML), School of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Eva BezakAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

aimThis paper provides a pedagogical example for systematic machine learning optimization in small dataset image segmentation, emphasizing hyperparameter selections. A simple process is presented for medical physicists to examine hyperparameter optimization. This is also applied to a case-study, demonstrating the benefit of the method. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn unrestricted public Computed Tomography (CT) dataset, with binary organ segmentation, was used to develop a multiclass segmentation model. To start the optimization process, a preliminary manual search of hyperparameters was conducted and from there a grid search identified the most influential result metrics. A total of 658 different models were trained in 2100 h, using 13 160 effective patients. The quantity of results was analyzed using random forest regression, identifying relative hyperparameter impact.

resultsMetric implied segmentation quality (accuracy 96.8%, precision 95.1%) and visual inspection were found to be mismatched. In this work batch normalization was most important, but performance varied with hyperparameters and metrics selected. Targeted grid-search optimization and random forest analysis of relative hyperparameter importance, was an easily implementable sensitivity analysis approach.

conclusionThe proposed optimization method gives a systematic and quantitative approach to something intuitively understood, that hyperparameters change model performance. Even just grid search optimization with random forest analysis presented here can be informative within hardware and data quality/availability limitations, adding confidence to model validity and minimize decision-making risks. By providing a guided methodology, this work helps medical physicists to improve their model optimization, irrespective of specific challenges posed by datasets and model design.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicHumansSemanticsapplied AIcomputer visionhyperparametersmachine learningsegmentationsensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID39387832
PMCPMC11633816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.