Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387496›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2024

Necroptosis-based glioblastoma prognostic subtypes: implications for TME remodeling and therapy response.

Muhammad Khan, Xiuting Huang, Xiaoxin Ye, Donghui Zhang, Baiyao Wang, Anan Xu, Rong Li, Anbang Ren, Chengcong Chen, Jingjing Song and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Muhammad KhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiuting HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoxin YeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Donghui ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Baiyao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Anan XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Rong LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Anbang RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Chengcong ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing SongDepartment of Pathology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Rong ZhengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yawei YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jie LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangzhou Institute of Cancer Research, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. Necroptosis, a pathological hallmark of GBM, is poorly understood in terms of its role in prognosis, tumor microenvironment (TME) alteration, and immunotherapy. METHODS &

resultsWe assessed the expression of 55 necroptosis-related genes in GBM and normal brain tissues. We identified necroptosis-stratified clusters using Uni-Cox and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to establish the 10-gene Glioblastoma Necroptosis Index (GNI). GNI demonstrated significant prognostic efficacy in the TCGA dataset (

conclusionsOur study highlights the role of necroptosis-related genes in glioblastoma (GBM) and their effects on the tumor microenvironment and patient prognosis. TheGNI demonstrates potential as a prognostic marker and provides insights into immune characteristics and treatment responsiveness.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaNecroptosisTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunotherapyIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisTumor Suppressor ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsBrain tumorcentral nervous systemgliomaimmunotherapyinflammationsingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID39387496
PMCPMC11469424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.