Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387466›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2025

Clustering-based risk stratification of prediabetes populations: Insights from the Taiwan and UK Biobanks.

Djeane Debora Onthoni, Ying-Erh Chen, Yi-Hsuan Lai, Guo-Hung Li, Yong-Sheng Zhuang, Hong-Ming Lin, Yu-Ping Hsiao, Ade Indra Onthoni, Hung-Yi Chiou, Ren-Hua Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Djeane Debora OnthoniInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Ying-Erh ChenDepartment of Risk Management and Insurance, Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yi-Hsuan LaiInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Guo-Hung LiInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Yong-Sheng ZhuangInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Hong-Ming LinInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Yu-Ping HsiaoInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Ade Indra OnthoniInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Hung-Yi ChiouInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
Ren-Hua ChungInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-6333

Funding

National Health Research Institutes PH-112-GP-04National Health Research Institutes PH-112-PP-10National Science and Technology Council MOST 110-2314-B-400-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

introductionThis study aimed to identify low- and high-risk diabetes groups within prediabetes populations using data from the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) and UK Biobank (UKB) through a clustering-based Unsupervised Learning (UL) approach, to inform targeted type 2 diabetes (T2D) interventions. MATERIALS AND

methodsData from TWB and UKB, comprising clinical and genetic information, were analyzed. Prediabetes was defined by glucose thresholds, and incident T2D was identified through follow-up data. K-means clustering was performed on prediabetes participants using significant features determined through logistic regression and LASSO. Cluster stability was assessed using mean Jaccard similarity, silhouette score, and the elbow method.

resultsWe identified two stable clusters representing high- and low-risk diabetes groups in both biobanks. The high-risk clusters showed higher diabetes incidence, with 15.7% in TWB and 13.0% in UKB, compared to 7.3% and 9.1% in the low-risk clusters, respectively. Notably, males were predominant in the high-risk groups, constituting 76.6% in TWB and 52.7% in UKB. In TWB, the high-risk group also exhibited significantly higher BMI, fasting glucose, and triglycerides, while UKB showed marginal significance in BMI and other metabolic indicators. Current smoking was significantly associated with increased diabetes risk in the TWB high-risk group (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves indicated significant differences in diabetes complication incidences between clusters.

conclusionsUL effectively identified risk-specific groups within prediabetes populations, with high-risk groups strongly associated male gender, higher BMI, smoking, and metabolic markers. Tailored preventive strategies, particularly for young males in Taiwan, are crucial to reducing T2D risk.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Prediabetic StateAdultAgedBlood GlucoseCluster AnalysisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBlood GlucoseMachine learningPrediabetesRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID39387466
PMCPMC11693582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.