Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387454›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024

Comparison of brief olfactory and cognitive assessments to neuroimaging biomarkers in the prediction of cognitive decline and dementia in the MCSA cohort.

Davangere P Devanand, Seonjoo Lee, José A Luchsinger, David Knopman, Maria Vassilaki, Jeffrey N Motter

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Olfactory Dysfunction and Cognitive Decline: Are They Related?Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Davangere P DevanandDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Seonjoo LeeDivision of Mental Health Data Science, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA.
José A LuchsingerDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
David KnopmanDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Maria VassilakiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jeffrey N MotterDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

SUPPLEMENT TO ALZHEIMERS DISEASE PATIENT REGISTRYU01AG006786 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GRAFF-RADFORD, JONATHAN, JACK, CLIFFORD R. · 1986 to 2023
$49.6M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062677 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2019 to 2026
$33.5M
Disease pathways in the population determined by amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration imaging biomarkersR37AG011378 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CLIFFORD R. JACK · 2018 to 2026
$6.8M
Validating the New Criteria for Preclinical Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG041851 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JACK, CLIFFORD R., KNOPMAN, DAVID S · 2012 to 2021
$6.3M
Development, Validation, and Application of an Imaging based CVD ScaleR01NS097495 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VEMURI, PRASHANTHI · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Interdisciplinary Infrastructure for Aging Research: Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR33AG058738 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LEBRASSEUR, NATHAN K, OLSON, JANET E · 2020 to 2022
$2.4M
Interdisciplinary Infrastructure for Aging Research: Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR21AG058738 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LEBRASSEUR, NATHAN K, OLSON, JANET E · 2018 to 2019
$437k
Alexander Family Alzheimer's Disease Research Professorship of the Mayo ClinicAlzheimer's AssociationGHR FoundationListon AwardMayo Clinic Research CommitteeMayo Foundation for Medical Education and ResearchNational Institute on Aging (NIA)NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062677NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041851NIA NIH HHS R21 AG058738NIA NIH HHS R33 AG058738NIA NIH HHS R37 AG011378NIA NIH HHS U01 AG006786NIH HHS P30 AG062677NIH HHS R01 AG041851NIH HHS R01 NS097495NIH HHS R37 AG011378NIH HHS U01 AG006786NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097495Schuler Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe evaluated impaired odor identification and global cognition as simple, cost-effective alternatives to neuroimaging biomarkers to predict cognitive decline and dementia in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.

methodsSix hundred forty-seven participants (mean 8.1, standard deviation 3.4 years' follow-up) had the following baseline procedures: modified Blessed Information Memory Concentration Test (BIMCT), 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT), structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG; subset).

resultsCognitive decline developed in 102 participants and dementia in 34 participants. In survival analyses, PiB PET showed robust prediction for cognitive decline. Impaired BSIT, impaired BIMCT, MRI, and FDG measures were also significant predictors. The combination of demographics + BSIT + BIMCT showed strong predictive utility (C-index 0.81), similar to demographics + PiB PET (C-index 0.80). Similar but stronger results were obtained for prediction of dementia. DISCUSSION: Impairment in both odor identification test and global cognition was comparable to PiB PET for predicting cognitive decline and dementia. HIGHLIGHTS: In 647 participants in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, several clinical markers and biomarkers each predicted cognitive decline or dementia during an average 8 years of follow-up. The combination of the demographic variables of age, sex, and education with a brief odor identification test (BSIT) and a global cognitive test (Blessed Information Memory Concentration Test) showed strong predictive utility (C-index 0.81) for cognitive decline that was similar to the demographic variables combined with Pittsburgh Compound B amyloid imaging (C-index 0.80). Combining a brief odor identification test with a brief cognitive test needs consideration as a simple, cost-effective option in the clinical assessment of individuals at risk of cognitive decline and dementia, as well as a potential tool to identify individuals who may benefit from disease-modifying treatments and to screen participants for prevention trials.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionDementiaMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingNeuropsychological TestsPositron-Emission TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overAniline CompoundsBrainCohort StudiesFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleAniline CompoundsBiomarkersFluorodeoxyglucose F18Thiazolesamyloid imagingcognitioncognitive declinedementiaolfactionpositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID39387454
PMCPMC11667519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.