ArticleBriefings in functional genomics2025
Systematic benchmark of single-cell hashtag demultiplexing approaches reveals robust performance of a clustering-based method.
Article in Briefings in functional genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderated designs can balance between batch-effect mitigation and cell loss due to hashtag-assisted pooling in single-cell experiments.Genome research · 2026Article
- Methodologies for Sample Multiplexing and Computational Deconvolution in Single-Cell Sequencing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Accurate sample deconvolution of pooled snRNA-seq using sex-dependent gene expression patterns.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Moderated designs can balance between batch-effect mitigation and cell loss due to hashtag-assisted pooling in single-cell experiments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Accurate sample deconvolution of pooled snRNA-seq using sex-dependent gene expression patterns.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell technology opened up a new avenue to delineate cellular status at a single-cell resolution and has become an essential tool for studying human diseases. Multiplexing allows cost-effective experiments by combining multiple samples and effectively mitigates batch effects. It starts by giving each sample a unique tag and then pooling them together for library preparation and sequencing. After sequencing, sample demultiplexing is performed based on tag detection, where cells belonging to one sample are expected to have a higher amount of the corresponding tag than cells from other samples. However, in reality, demultiplexing is not straightforward due to the noise and contamination from various sources. Successful demultiplexing depends on the efficient removal of such contamination. Here, we perform a systematic benchmark combining different normalization methods and demultiplexing approaches using real-world data and simulated datasets. We show that accounting for sequencing depth variability increases the separability between tagged and untagged cells, and the clustering-based approach outperforms existing tools. The clustering-based workflow is available as an R package from https://github.com/hwlim/hashDemux.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.