ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
Batch-effect correction in single-cell RNA sequencing data using JIVE.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Applications of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in Glioblastoma: A Scoping Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: In single-cell RNA sequencing analysis, addressing batch effects-technical artifacts stemming from factors such as varying sequencing technologies, equipment, and capture times-is crucial. These factors can cause unwanted variation and obfuscate the underlying biological signal of interest. The joint and individual variation explained (JIVE) method can be used to extract shared biological patterns from multi-source sequencing data while adjusting for individual non-biological variations (i.e. batch effect). However, its current implementation is originally designed for bulk sequencing data, making it computationally infeasible for large-scale single-cell sequencing datasets. Results: In this study, we enhance JIVE for large-scale single-cell data by boosting its computational efficiency. Additionally, we introduce a novel application of JIVE for batch-effect correction on multiple single-cell sequencing datasets. Our enhanced method aims to decompose single-cell sequencing datasets into a joint structure capturing the true biological variability and individual structures, which capture technical variability within each batch. This joint structure is then suitable for use in downstream analyses. We benchmarked the results against four popular tools, Seurat v5, Harmony, LIGER, and Combat-seq, which were developed for this purpose. JIVE performed best in terms of preserving cell-type effects and in scenarios in which the batch sizes are balanced. Availability and implementation: The JIVE implementation used for this analysis can be found at https://github.com/oconnell-statistics-lab/scJIVE.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.