Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387056›Full record

ArticleRegenerative engineering and translational medicine2024

Classes of Stem Cells: From Biology to Engineering.

Shiv Shah, Debolina Ghosh, Takayoshi Otsuka, Cato T Laurencin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative engineering and translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Direct in vivo reprogramming to relieve tissue ischemia via induced vasculogenesis.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shiv ShahThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-3711, USA.
Debolina GhoshThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-3711, USA.
Takayoshi OtsukaThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-3711, USA.
Cato T LaurencinThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-3711, USA.

Funding

Phase II of BUILDing SCHOLARS - Student Training CoreTL4GM118971 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI ALEY, STEPHEN B, BOLAND, THOMAS · 2015 to 2023
$9.9M
Regenerative Engineering of Musculoskeletal Tissues- a Convergence Doctoral Training ProgramT32AR079114 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LAURENCIN, CATO T. · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR079114NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The majority of adult tissues are limited in self-repair and regeneration due to their poor intrinsic regenerative capacity. It is widely recognized that stem cells are present in almost all adult tissues, but the natural regeneration in adult mammals is not sufficient to recover function after injury or disease. Historically, 3 classes of stem cells have been defined: embryonic stem cells (ESCs), adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Here, we have defined a fourth fully engineered class: the synthetic artificial stem cell (SASC). This review aims to discuss the applications of these stem cell classes in musculoskeletal regenerative engineering. Method: We screened articles in PubMed and bibliographic search using a combination of keywords. Relevant and high-cited articles were chosen for inclusion in this narrative review. Results: In this review, we discuss the different classes of stem cells that are biologically derived (ESCs and MSCs) or semi-engineered/engineered (iPSCs, SASC). We also discuss the applications of these stem cell classes in musculoskeletal regenerative engineering. We further summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using each of the classes and how they impact the clinical translation of these therapies. Conclusion: Each class of stem cells has advantages and disadvantages in preclinical and clinical settings. We also propose the engineered SASC class as a potentially disease-modifying therapy that harnesses the paracrine action of biologically derived stem cells to mimic regenerative potential. Lay Summary: The majority of adult tissues are limited in self-repair and regeneration, even though stem cells are present in almost all adult tissues. Historically, 3 classes of stem cells have been defined: embryonic stem cells (ESCs), adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Here, we have defined a fourth, fully engineered class: the synthetic artificial stem cell (SASC). In this review, we discuss the applications of each of these stem cell classes in musculoskeletal regenerative engineering. We further summarize the advantages and disadvantages of using each of these classes and how they impact the clinical translation of these therapies.

Indexed as

MusculoskeletalRegenerationSecretomeStem cellSyntheticTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39387056
PMCPMC11463971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.