Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39387055›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2024

Modelling human diabetes

Moustapha Ka, Eleanor Hawkins, Celio Pouponnot, Bertrand Duvillié

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moustapha KaDepartment of Signaling, Radiobiology and Cancer, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
Eleanor HawkinsDepartment of Signaling, Radiobiology and Cancer, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
Celio PouponnotDepartment of Signaling, Radiobiology and Cancer, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
Bertrand DuvilliéDepartment of Signaling, Radiobiology and Cancer, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a complex metabolic disease which most commonly has a polygenic origin; however, in rare cases, diabetes may be monogenic. This is indeed the case in both Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) and neonatal diabetes. These disease subtypes are believed to be simpler than Type 1 (T1D) and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), which allows for more precise modelling. During the three last decades, many studies have focused on rodent models. These investigations provided a wealth of knowledge on both pancreas development and beta cell function. In particular, they allowed the establishment of a hierarchy of the transcription factors and highlighted the role of microenvironmental factors in the control of progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation. Transgenic mice also offered the possibility to decipher the mechanisms that define the functional identity of the pancreatic beta cells. Despite such interest in transgenic mice, recent data have also indicated that important differences exist between mice and human. To overcome these limitations, new human models are necessary. In the present review, we describe these

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Insulin-Secreting CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceMice, TransgenicdiabetesisletsMODYorganoidspancreasstem cells

Identifiers

PMID39387055
PMCPMC11461259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.