ArticleInternet interventions2024
The therapeutic alliance in blended versus face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents and young adults with a depressive disorder.
Article in Internet interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic alliance across delivery modalities: a systematic narrative review of alliance strength and outcome prediction in face-to-face, online, and blended psychotherapy.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring client perspectives: a qualitative study on how families experience (blended) forensic outpatient systemic therapy for juvenile antisocial behavior.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A depressive disorder during adolescence is a serious and disabling disorder, which has a high impact on the development of adolescents. Blended treatment, combining online and face-to-face sessions, is effective and can reduce some of the barriers for adolescents to use mental health care. There is a lack of knowledge about whether therapeutic alliance is established in blended treatment for adolescents and young adults suffering from a depressive disorder. This study examines whether the quality of the therapeutic alliance differs when cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is delivered in combination with online intervention (b-CBT) compared to solely face-to-face (FtF-CBT) and the extent to which a stronger therapeutic alliance is associated with better treatment outcome. Methods: A pragmatic quasi-experimental design was used. Data collected within two separate studies were combined. A total of 85 participants (80 % female), aged 13-22 (mean = 16.63, SD = 1.92) were recruited within mental health care institutions and diagnosed with a depressive disorder (using K-SADS). Assessments were done at pre-treatment (T0), after five weeks (T1), after ten weeks (T2), post-treatment (T3) and one to four weeks after treatment (T4) and included measures of depressive symptomatology (CDI-2). The therapeutic alliance was measured at T1, T2 and T3 by the TASC. Results: No differences in therapeutic alliance between b-CBT and FtF-CBT were found on either client-rated or therapist-rated therapeutic alliance. For both intervention groups, no significant association between the therapeutic alliance and depressive outcome was found. Discussion: This study shows that providing part of CBT using an online environment does not have a negative impact on the therapeutic alliance. In contrast to earlier research, no association was found between the therapeutic alliance and therapy outcome in neither the b-CBT nor the FtF-CBT intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.