Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386992›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Facebook increases political knowledge, reduces well-being and informational treatments do little to help.

Kevin Arceneaux, Martial Foucault, Kalli Giannelos, Jonathan Ladd, Can Zengin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin ArceneauxCenter for Political Research at Sciences Po (CEVIPOF), Paris 75007, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2884-5238
Martial FoucaultCenter for Political Research at Sciences Po (CEVIPOF), Paris 75007, France.
Kalli GiannelosCenter for Political Research at Sciences Po (CEVIPOF), Paris 75007, France.
Jonathan LaddDepartment of Government and MCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Can ZenginCenter for Political Research at Sciences Po (CEVIPOF), Paris 75007, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly three billion people actively use Facebook, making it the largest social media platform in the world. Previous research shows that the social media platform reduces users' happiness, while increasing political knowledge. It also may increase partisan polarization. Working to build a scientific consensus, we test whether the potential negative effects of Facebook use can be overcome with the help of minimalist informational interventions that a parallel line of research has shown to be effective at inducing people to be more accurate and civil. We conducted a pre-registered well-powered Facebook deactivation experiment during the 2022 French presidential election. In line with previous research, we find that deactivating Facebook increases subjective well-being and reduces political knowledge. However, deactivating Facebook had no overall effect on the level of political or social polarization during the election. Moreover, we find little evidence that minimalist informational interventions in a field setting helped individuals who deactivated Facebook to become better informed.

Indexed as

electionFacebooknews knowledgepolarizationsubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID39386992
PMCPMC11461047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.