ArticleCureus2024
Laparoscopic Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Center in the United Kingdom.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case report: small bowel volvulus following laparoscopic-assisted Soave pull-through for adult Hirschsprung disease: a diagnostic dilemma.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Acute intestinal obstruction in children: a comparison of laparoscopic treatment and open surgery.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives To present a single-center experience of laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction (ASBO) based on seven years of data and demonstrate its suitability for the United Kingdom (UK). Methods A retrospective review of case notes to evaluate postoperative outcomes was conducted. All emergency small bowel obstructions treated laparoscopically were included. The cases that were converted to a laparotomy were excluded. Demographics (age, sex), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, indication for surgery, duration of stay, complications, requirement of stoma, requirement of intensive treatment unit/high dependency unit (ITU/HDU), reoperation/readmissions, and 30-day mortality were noted. The results were tabulated and analyzed accordingly. Results There were 119 patients studied, with a median age of 66 (range: 17-97). The sex ratio was 62 females to 57 males. Primary etiologies of adhesion bands (49.5%, 59) and hernia (31.9%, 38) were the most common. Minor and major complications were 15 (12.6%) and 37 (31%), respectively. Three (2.5%) patients passed away within 30 days of surgery. The median length of stay (LOS) was eight days. The median LOS subgroup analysis showed nine days for adhesiolysis and six days for hernias. Discussion This study shows that there is significant heterogeneity in outcomes regarding small bowel obstruction around the world. We have demonstrated similar to better results in our center relative to other prominent centers in the UK. This can be attributed to the patient cohort, presentation, and physiological status on admission, delay to surgery, and associated co-morbidities to name a few. Conclusion This study indicates that laparoscopic surgery is a safe approach to treating ASBO, provided adequate expertise and infrastructure are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.