Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386888›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2024

An oral developmental toxicity study of generic pesticide pinoxaden in rabbits.

Inna Rashkivska, Yana Kolianchuk, Mykola Prodanchuk, Nadiia Nedopytanska, Natalia Bubalo, Mojmir Mach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inna RashkivskaL.I. Medved's Research Center of Preventive Toxicology, Food and Chemical Safety, Ministry of Health Ukraine, Ukraine.
Yana KolianchukL.I. Medved's Research Center of Preventive Toxicology, Food and Chemical Safety, Ministry of Health Ukraine, Ukraine.
Mykola ProdanchukL.I. Medved's Research Center of Preventive Toxicology, Food and Chemical Safety, Ministry of Health Ukraine, Ukraine.
Nadiia NedopytanskaL.I. Medved's Research Center of Preventive Toxicology, Food and Chemical Safety, Ministry of Health Ukraine, Ukraine.
Natalia BubaloL.I. Medved's Research Center of Preventive Toxicology, Food and Chemical Safety, Ministry of Health Ukraine, Ukraine.
Mojmir MachCentre of Experimental Medicine of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety assessment of pinoxaden by the Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) established a NOAEL of 30 mg/kg bw/day for maternal and embryo/fetal toxicity from a rabbit developmental toxicity study. However, the Pesticide Peer Review Expert meeting (EFSA) lowered the NOAEL to 10 mg/kg bw/day due to observed diaphragm malformations in one developmental toxicity study in rabbits, proposing a classification for developmental effects as Category 2 R63 or H361d. Both JMPR and EFSA set the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) at 0.1 mg/kg bw/day, derived from a 2-year rat study NOAEL with a safety factor of 100, but EFSA also supported ADI by teratology study in rabbits. The current prenatal developmental toxicity study on pinoxaden aimed to elucidate and clarify the potential teratogenic effects and could provide supplementary data for determining the ADI for pinoxaden. The study design exceeded the OECD TG 414 by including an assessment of internal organs. The test item was orally administered by gavage daily from day 6 to day 28 of gestation to three groups of animals, each composed of 21 females, in dose levels of 0, 10 and 30 mg/kg/bw/day. One female from the 30 mg/kg/bw/day dose group was euthanized in extremis on Day 27

Indexed as

Developmental toxicity studyPinoxadenRabbits

Identifiers

PMID39386888
PMCPMC11462063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.