Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386874›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Predictive models and treatment efficacy for liver cancer patients with bone metastases: A comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors and nomogram development.

Peng Qiu, Yunxiang Feng, Kai Zhao, Yuanxin Shi, Xiangyu Li, Zhengdong Deng, Jianming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peng QiuDepartment of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Research Center Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yunxiang FengDepartment of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Research Center Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Kai ZhaoDepartment of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Research Center Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuanxin ShiDepartment of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Research Center Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiangyu LiDepartment of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Research Center Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhengdong DengDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jianming WangDepartment of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Research Center Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bone metastasis considerably undermines the prognosis of advanced primary liver cancer patients. Though its impact is well-recognized, the clinical field still lacks robust predictive models that can accurately forecast patient outcomes and aid in treatment effectiveness evaluation. Addressing this gap is paramount for improving patient management and survival. Materials and methods: We conducted an extensive analysis using data from the SEER database (2010-2020). COX regression analysis was applied to identify prognostic factors for primary liver cancer with bone metastasis (PLCBM). Nomograms were developed and validated to predict survival outcomes in PLCBM patients. Additionally, propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses lent additional insight by dissecting the survival advantage conferred by various treatment strategies. Results: A total of 470 patients with PLCBM were included in our study. The median overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for these patients were both 5 months. We unveiled several independent prognosticators for OS and CSS, spanning demographic to therapeutic parameters like marital status, cancer grade, histological type, and treatments received. This discovery enabled the formulation of two novel nomograms-now verified to eclipse the predictive prowess of the traditional TNM staging system regarding discrimination and clinical utility. Additionally, propensity score matching analysis showed the effectiveness of surgeries, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in improving OS and CSS outcomes for PLCBM patients. Conclusions: Our investigation stands out by introducing pioneering nomograms for prognostic evaluation in PLCBM, a leap forward compared to existing tools. Far exceeding mere academic exercise, these nomograms hold immense clinical value, serving as a foundation for nuanced risk stratification systems and delivering dynamic, interactive guides, allowing healthcare professionals and patients to assess individual bone metastasis survival probabilities and personalize treatment selection.

Indexed as

Bone metastasisChemotherapyNomogramPrimary liver cancerPrognosisPSMRadiotherapyRisk factorsSEERSurgery

Identifiers

PMID39386874
PMCPMC11462488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.