ArticleHeliyon2024
Influence of hollow droplet impact and spreading characteristics on the cylindrical lateral surface.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, 3D model of a hollow glycerin droplet impacting on a cylindrical cross-section was numerically analyzed to coat the lateral surface of the cylinder. The hollow droplets had exterior diameters of 5.5 mm, 5.25 mm, and 5 mm, and the impact velocity was 1 m/s. To model, the influence of droplets on OpenFoam software, the Volume Of Fluid technique was utilized (VOF). The Newtonian, incompressible, and laminar fluid phase of a glycerin droplet was investigated using air with a diameter of 4 mm as the gas phase. The hydrodynamic behavior of droplet collisions as well as fluid properties were investigated. As a result, when can be observed in the simple cylinder, as the outer diameter increased, the spread diameter shrank. The least amount distributed diameter in Case 3 was 1.404, whereas the highest amount in Case 4 was 1.625. The situations with a simple lateral surface, uniform spread occurred, while in cases with a spiral lateral surface, non-uniform spread occurred. Observed the maximum length in Case 3 was 4.12 mm and the minimum was 1.83 mm in Case 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.