ArticleHeliyon2024
Ablation and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Balancing efficacy and safety in the treatment of benign adrenal gland tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficiency of Microwave Ablation for Cortisol-Producing Adrenal Adenomas: Case Series and a Literature Review.Acta medica Lituanica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aldosterone-producing adenomas cause hypertension in 5-10 % of cases. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard treatment for early-stage adrenal gland tumors, but minimally invasive procedures, such as ablative techniques can also be applied. Therefore, we aimed to compare laparoscopic adrenalectomy and ablation techniques in terms of efficacy and safety in the treatment of benign adrenal gland tumors. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic search in five databases and included studies comparing the efficacy and safety of ablation techniques and laparoscopic adrenalectomy. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for eligible studies with binary outcomes, and mean differences (MD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for continuous outcomes. Results: Five studies focusing on aldosterone-producing adenomas were included in our review. A total of 119 patients at 14 centers underwent ablation, and 161 patients had laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The complication rates (OR: 0.98, CI: 0.35-2.69) were similar in both groups, but among complications, hypertensive crisis (OR: 8.13; CI: 1.14-58.11) was more frequent in the ablative group, and even the success rate of interventions - the resolution of hypertension (OR: 0.30, CI: 0.16-0.56) - was lower in this group. On the other hand, the advantage of ablation was shorter intervention time (MD: 75.64 min; CI: 6.33-144.95), shorter hospital stay (MD: 1.6 days; CI: 0.88-2.31), and less perioperative blood loss (MD: 43.55 ml; CI: 12.07-75.04) compared to laparoscopy. Conclusion: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is still the best therapeutic approach, but ablation can be an appropriate alternative option for the treatment of aldosterone-producing adrenal gland tumors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.