ArticleHeliyon2024
Identification of novel proteins for coronary artery disease by integrating GWAS data and human plasma proteomes.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MORF4L1 regulation and its role in chromatin remodeling, DNA damage, cellular senescence, and cardiometabolic disease.Vascular pharmacology · 2026Review
- Chaperonin in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Mendelian randomization analysis of immune cell traits and their association with cervical cancer risk.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Screening and regulatory mechanism exploration of M1 macrophage polarization and efferocytosis-related biomarkers in coronary heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most coronary artery disease (CAD) risk loci identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are located in non-coding regions, hampering the interpretation of how they confer CAD risk. It is essential to integrate GWAS with molecular traits data to further explore the genetic basis of CAD. Methods: We used the probabilistic Mendelian randomization (PMR) method to identify potential proteins involved in CAD by integrating CAD GWAS data (∼76,014 cases and ∼264,785 controls) and human plasma proteomes (N = 35,559). Then, Bayesian co-localization analysis, confirmatory PMR analysis using independent plasma proteome data (N = 7752), and gene expression data (N1 = 213, N2 = 670) were performed to validate candidate proteins. We further investigated the associations between candidate proteins and CAD-related traits and explored the rationality and biological functions of candidate proteins through disease enrichment, cell type-specific, GO, and KEGG enrichment analysis. Results: This study inferred that the abundance of 30 proteins in the plasma was causally associated with CAD ( Conclusions: Our integration analysis has identified 30 candidate proteins for CAD, which may provide important leads to design future functional studies and potential drug targets for CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.