Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386831›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Predictive modeling for the adsorptive and photocatalytic removal of phenolic contaminants from water using artificial neural networks.

Shahzar Hafeez, Ayesha Ishaq, Azeem Intisar, Tariq Mahmood, Muhammad Imran Din, Ejaz Ahmed, Muhammad Rizwan Tariq, Muhammad Amin Abid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shahzar HafeezCentre for Inorganic Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, 54590, Pakistan.
Ayesha IshaqCentre for Physical Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, 54590, Pakistan.
Azeem IntisarCentre for Inorganic Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, 54590, Pakistan.
Tariq MahmoodCentre for High Energy Physics, University of the Punjab, 54590, Pakistan.
Muhammad Imran DinCentre for Physical Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, 54590, Pakistan.
Ejaz AhmedCentre for Organic Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of the Punjab, 54590, Pakistan.
Muhammad Rizwan TariqDepartment of Food Sciences, University of the Punjab, 54590, Pakistan.
Muhammad Amin AbidDepartment of Chemistry, University of Sahiwal, Sahiwal, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous harmful phenolic contaminants are discharged into water that pose a serious threat to environment where two of the most important purification methodologies for the mitigation of phenolic contaminants are adsorption and photocatalysis. Besides cost, each process has drawbacks in terms of productivity, environmental impact, sludge creation, and the development of harmful by-products. To overcome these limitations, the modeling and optimization of water treatment methods is required. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is employed for the interpretation of treatment-based processes due to powerful learning, simplicity, high estimation accuracy, effectiveness, and improvement of process efficiency where artificial neural networks (ANNs) are most frequently employed for predicting and analyzing the efficiency of processes applied for the mitigation of these phenolic contaminants from water. ANNs are superior to conventional linear regression models because the latter are incapable of dealing with non-linear systems. ANNs can also reduce the operational cost of treating phenol-contaminated water. A correlation coefficient of >0.99 can be achieved using ANN with enhanced phenol mitigation percentage accuracy generally ranging from 80 % to 99.99 %. Using ANN optimization, the maximum phenol mitigation efficiencies achieved were 99.99 % for phenol, 99.93 % for bisphenol A, 99.6 % for nonylphenol, 97.1 % for 2-nitrophenol, 96.6 % for 4-chlorophenol and 90 % for 2,6-dichlorophenol. In numerous ANN models, Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm for training was employed using MATLAB software. This study overviews their employment and application for optimization and modeling of removal processes and explicitly discusses the important input and output parameters necessary for better performance of the system. The comparison of ANNs with other AI techniques revealed that ANNs have better predictability for mitigation of most of the phenolic contaminants. Furthermore, several challenges and future prospects have also been discussed.

Indexed as

AdsorptionArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural network modelsPhenolic contaminantsPhotocatalysisWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID39386831
PMCPMC11462199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.