ArticleHeliyon2024
Current approaches to diagnosing and treating idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: A summary from in-depth clinician interviews.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An endocrine microbe immunity framework for granulomatous mastitis toward phenotype-oriented interpretation.iScience · 2026Review
- Genomic Insights into Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis through Whole-Exome Sequencing: A Case Report of Eight Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare, chronic inflammatory breast condition primarily affecting women of reproductive age. Its diagnosis is challenging due to similarities with other breast disorders, necessitating exclusion of other granulomatous diseases. The management of IGM remains inconsistent and unclear, with high recurrence rates and varying practices. Methods: This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with nine clinicians from Singapore, Malaysia, and Egypt to examine current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for IGM. Transcripts were analysed using NVivo software for coding and summarisation. Findings: Clinicians predominantly used imaging and histopathology for diagnosis. Treatment commonly involved corticosteroids, though dosages and tapering regimens varied widely. Methotrexate was used sparingly for refractory cases due to associated risks. Surgical interventions were infrequent, reflecting a preference for medical management. There was a consensus on the need for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to establish standardised treatment protocols. Interpretation: This study reveals the complex nature of IGM diagnosis and treatment from clinicians in Singapore, Malaysia and Egypt. This underscores the need for more specific and definitive diagnostic tests, rather than relying on exclusionary methods, and standardised treatment guidelines. Multi-centre RCTs are essential for developing evidence-based protocols to improve patient outcomes and address regional differences effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.