ArticleHeliyon2024
Predictors of a positive birth experience in childbirth: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived Safety in Childbirth: Pregnancy Predictors of Women's Experiences During Childbirth.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Factors associated with women's childbirth experience in Slovakia: A cross-sectional analysis of overall childbirth experience and individual domains of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2).European journal of midwifery · 2026Article
- Birth satisfaction in different social contexts and the challenges of ensuring measurement validity.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recognizing predictors of positive birth experience is viewed as essential for minimizing negative experiences during childbirth that are related to current obstetric care, especially when those could be attributed to intrapartum interventions. The CEQ-E is a suitable instrument for investigating maternal birth experience within the Spanish population, highlighting the necessity to identify predictors for all its domains. This study aimed to identify predictors of positive birth experience based on socio-demographic and clinical variables, and obstetric interventions. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted with consecutive sampling (N = 301). Quantitative data were collected by the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E) and an Ad hoc questionnaire. Clinical data was obtained from participants' medical records. Descriptive, bivariant and multivariant analysis were performed. Results: The CEQ overall mean score was 3.18(SD:0.42), showing the highest score for the professional support (3.79; SD: 0.43) and the lowest for the own capacity (2.8; SD:0.57). All domains and overall score showed negative correlations with the number of intrapartum interventions (p ≤ .001). Inductions of labour, instrumental deliveries, and caesarean sections were inversely related to; overall birth experience score (p ≤ .001), perceived safety (p ≤ .001), and own capacity (p ≤ .001). Epidural analgesia was linked to worse values of birth experience (p ≤ .001). Predictors of positive birth experience were identified as having a midwife as birth attendant (p ≤ .001) and neonatal higher Apgar scores at birth (p ≤ .001), whereas higher maternal education grade (p = .04), inductions of labour (p ≤ .001) and caesarean births (p ≤ .001) had worse values on birth experience. Conclusion: Women reported a positive birth experience, and professional support was highly valued. Key predictors of lower scores in birth experience included higher maternal education, caesarean and instrumental deliveries, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Spontaneous labour onset predicted better capacity and safety. Epidural use decreased participation. Midwife-attended births reported better scores on birth experience, highlighting their importance in maternal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.