Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386795›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Preparation, process optimisation, stability and bacteriostatic assessment of composite nanoemulsion containing corosolic acid.

Haimei Li, Xinjia Tan, Liyan Qin, Mansour K Gatasheh, Lei Zhang, Wenmin Lin, Feng Hu, Rian Yan, Mariam K Alshammri, Yingbin Shen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haimei LiSchool of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xinjia TanLongping Branch, College of Biology, Hunan University, Changsha, 410125, China.
Liyan QinSchool of Pharmacy, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Guangxi, 530200, China.
Mansour K GatashehDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Lei ZhangCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, 830052, China.
Wenmin LinSchool of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Feng HuGuangdong Chubang Food Co., Ltd, Yangjiang, 529500, China.
Rian YanDepartment of Food Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
Mariam K AlshammriDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, 2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Yingbin ShenSchool of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Arshad Mehmood AbbasiDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, 22060, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Jing QiSchool of Pharmacy, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Guangxi, 530200, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corosolic acid (CA), a pentacyclic triterpenoid, exhibits remarkably low hydrophilicity, restricting its application in aqueous systems. To enhance its hydrophilicity, we optimised nanoemulsion preparation conditions, resulting in a stable corosolic acid nanoemulsion system. By screening the oil phase, surfactant, and cosurfactant, along with investigating the mass ratio of surfactant and cosurfactant and the preparation temperature, we achieved an optimal corosolic acid nanoemulsion. We measured the particle size, polydispersity coefficient, and Zeta potential of the optimised formulation. The nanoemulsion's sustained-release effect, stability, and antibacterial activity were subsequently examined. The optimised formulation comprised ethyl oleate, cremophor EL, and Tween 80 (1.5:1), combined with ethanol in a ratio of 1:9:2.25 (w/w/w), and was prepared at 30 °C. This optimised corosolic acid nanoemulsion exhibited uniform particle size distribution, favourable dispersion, and notable slow-release capabilities. Importantly, the nanoemulsion demonstrated exceptional stability. In comparison to the positive control's bacteriostatic zone diameter, it was evident that the CA nanoemulsion (1.06 ± 0.11 mm) and blank nanoemulsion (1.03 ± 0.05 mm) both displayed notable inhibitory activity against

Indexed as

Corosolic acidNanoemulsionProcess optimisationStability

Identifiers

PMID39386795
PMCPMC11462487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.