ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Category learning drives cortical attentional gain to diagnostic dimensions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans and other animals develop remarkable perceptual and cognitive specializations for identifying, differentiating, and acting on classes of ecologically important signals. This expertise is flexible enough to support diverse perceptual judgments: a voice, for example, simultaneously conveys what a talker says, as well as myriad cues about her identity and state. Expert perception across complex signals thus involves discovering and learning regularities that best inform diverse perceptual judgments, as well as weighting this information flexibly as task demands change. Here, we test whether this flexibility may involve endogenous attentional gain. We use two prospective auditory category learning tasks to relate a complex, entirely novel soundscape to four classes of "alien identity" and two classes of "alien size." Identity, but not size, categorization requires discovery and learning of patterned acoustic input situated in one of two simultaneous, non-overlapping frequency bands. This allows us to capitalize on the coarsely segregated frequency-band-specific channels tiling auditory cortex, using fMRI to ask whether category-relevant perceptual information present in one frequency band is prioritized relative to simultaneous, uninformative information in the other frequency band. Among participants expert at alien identity categorization, we observe prioritization of the identity-diagnostic frequency band that persists even when the diagnostic information becomes irrelevant in the size categorization task. Tellingly, the neural selectivity evoked implicitly in the identity categorization task aligns with that in an independent task, where activation is driven by explicit and sustained selective attention to pure tones in one or the other frequency band. Additionally, the learning trajectories taken to achieve expert-level categorization leave fingerprints on the patterns of neural activity associated with the diagnostic dimension. In all, this indicates that acquiring categories can drive the emergence of acquired attentional gain to category-diagnostic input dimensions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.