Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386660›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Bayesian inference by visuomotor neurons in prefrontal cortex.

Thomas Langlois, Julie A Charlton, Robbe L T Goris

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas LangloisCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.
Julie A CharltonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-190X
Robbe L T GorisCenter for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2218-3720

Funding

CPS Training ProgramT32EY021462 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Mary M Hayhoe, Alexander C Huk · 2012 to 2026
$2.5M
Uncertainty, inference, and introspection in the primate visual systemR01EY032999 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI GORIS, ROBBE L · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032999NEI NIH HHS T32 EY021462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual judgements of the environment emerge from the concerted activity of neural populations in decision-making areas downstream of sensory cortex [1, 2, 3]. When the sensory input is ambiguous, perceptual judgements can be biased by prior expectations shaped by environmental regularities [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11]. These effects are examples of Bayesian inference, a reasoning method in which prior knowledge is leveraged to optimize uncertain decisions [12, 13]. However, it is not known how decision-making circuits combine sensory signals and prior expectations to form a perceptual decision. Here, we study neural population activity in the prefrontal cortex of macaque monkeys trained to report perceptual judgments of ambiguous visual stimuli under two different stimulus distributions. We analyze the component of the neural population response that represents the formation of the perceptual decision (the decision variable, DV), and find that its dynamical evolution reflects the integration of sensory signals and prior expectations. Prior expectations impact the DV's trajectory both before and during stimulus presentation such that DV trajectories with a smaller dynamic range result in more biased and less sensitive perceptual decisions. These results reveal a mechanism by which prefrontal circuits can execute Bayesian inference.

Identifiers

PMID39386660
PMCPMC11463605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.