ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
High-Throughput Empirical and Virtual Screening to Discover Novel Inhibitors of Polyploid Giant Cancer Cells in Breast Cancer.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapy resistance in breast cancer is increasingly attributed to polyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs), which arise through whole-genome doubling and exhibit heightened resilience to standard treatments. Characterized by enlarged nuclei and increased DNA content, these cells tend to be dormant under therapeutic stress, driving disease relapse. Despite their critical role in resistance, strategies to effectively target PGCCs are limited, largely due to the lack of high-throughput methods for assessing their viability. Traditional assays lack the sensitivity needed to detect PGCC-specific elimination, prompting the development of novel approaches. To address this challenge, we developed a high-throughput single-cell morphological analysis workflow designed to differentiate compounds that selectively inhibit non-PGCCs, PGCCs, or both. Using this method, we screened a library of 2,726 FDA Phase 1-approved drugs, identifying promising anti-PGCC candidates, including proteasome inhibitors, FOXM1, CHK, and macrocyclic lactones. Notably, RNA-Seq analysis of cells treated with the macrocyclic lactone Pyronaridine revealed AXL inhibition as a potential strategy for targeting PGCCs. Although our single-cell morphological analysis pipeline is powerful, empirically testing all existing compounds is impractical and inefficient. To overcome this limitation, we trained a machine learning model to predict anti-PGCC efficacy
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.