Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386534›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Megabase-scale loss of heterozygosity provoked by CRISPR-Cas9 DNA double-strand breaks.

Samantha B Regan, Darpan Medhi, Travis B White, Yi-Zhen Jiang, Su Jia, Qichen Deng, Maria Jasin

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harnessing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is a powerful approach for gene editing, but it may provoke loss of heterozygosity (LOH), which predisposes to tumorigenesis. To interrogate this risk, we developed a two- color flow cytometry-based system (Flo-LOH), detecting LOH in ∼5% of cells following a DSB. After this initial increase, cells with LOH decrease due to a competitive disadvantage with parental cells, but if isolated, they stably propagate. Segmental loss from terminal deletions with de novo telomere addition and nonreciprocal translocations is observed as well as whole chromosome loss, especially following a centromeric DSB. LOH spans megabases distal from the DSB, but also frequently tens of megabases centromere-proximal. Inhibition of microhomology-mediated end joining massively increases LOH, which is synergistically increased with concomitant inhibition of canonical nonhomologous end joining. The capacity for large-scale LOH must therefore be considered when using DSB-based gene editing, especially in conjunction with end joining inhibition.

Identifiers

PMID39386534
PMCPMC11463394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.