ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Spectral Shift in Zebrafish Cone Opsins.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- cAMP-Mediated Modulation of Functions of Green- and Blue-Sensitive Cones in Zebrafish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual pigments are essential for converting light into electrical signals during vision. Composed of an opsin protein and a retinal-based chromophore, pigments in vertebrate rods (Rh1) and cones (Rh2) have different spectral sensitivities, with distinct peak absorption wavelengths determined by the shape and composition of the chromophore binding pocket. Despite advances in understanding Rh1 pigments such as bovine rhodopsin, the molecular basis of spectral shifts in Rh2 cone opsins has been less studied, particularly the E122Q mutation, which accounts for about half of the observed spectral shift in these pigments. In this study, we employed molecular modeling and quantum mechanical techniques to investigate the molecular mechanisms behind the spectral difference in blue-shifted Rh2-1 (absorption peak = 467 nm, 122Q) and green-shifted Rh2-4 (absorption peak = 505 nm, 122E) zebrafish cone opsins. We modeled the pigments 3D structures based on their sequences and conducted all-atom molecular dynamics simulations totaling 2 microseconds. Distance analysis of the trajectories identified three key sites: E113, E181, and E122. The E122Q mutation, previously known, validates our findings, while E181 and E113 are newly identified contributors. Structural analysis revealed key features with differing values that explain the divergent spectral sensitivities of Rh2-1 and Rh2-4: 1) chromophore atom fluctuations and C5-C6 torsion angle, 2) binding pocket volume, 3) hydration patterns, and 4) E113-chromophore interaction stability. Quantum mechanics further confirms the critical role of residue E181 in Rh2-1 and E122 in Rh2-4 for their spectral behavior. Our study provides new insights into the molecular determinants of spectral shifts in cone opsins, and we anticipate that it will serve as a starting point for a broader understanding of the functional diversity of visual pigments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.