ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Adaptation of retinal discriminability to natural scenes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory systems discriminate between stimuli to direct behavioral choices, a process governed by two distinct properties - neural sensitivity to specific stimuli, and neural variability that importantly includes correlations between neurons. Two questions that have received extensive investigation and debate are whether visual systems are optimized for natural scenes, and whether correlated neural variability contributes to this optimization. However, the lack of sufficient computational models has made these questions inaccessible in the context of the normal function of the visual system, which is to discriminate between natural stimuli. Here we take a direct approach to analyze discriminability under natural scenes for a population of salamander retinal ganglion cells using a model of the retinal neural code that captures both sensitivity and variability. Using methods of information geometry and generative machine learning, we analyzed the manifolds of natural stimuli and neural responses, finding that discriminability in the ganglion cell population adapts to enhance information transmission about natural scenes, in particular about localized motion. Contrary to previous proposals, correlated noise reduces information transmission and arises simply as a natural consequence of the shared circuitry that generates changing spatiotemporal visual sensitivity. These results address a long-standing debate as to the role of retinal correlations in the encoding of natural stimuli and reveal how the highly nonlinear receptive fields of the retina adapt dynamically to increase information transmission under natural scenes by performing the important ethological function of local motion discrimination.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.