ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Hydrogels with Independently Controlled Adhesion Ligand Mobility and Viscoelasticity Increase Cell Adhesion and Spreading.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A primary objective in designing hydrogels for cell culture is recreating the cell-matrix interactions found within human tissues. Identifying the most important biomaterial features for these interactions is challenging because it is difficult to independently adjust variables such as matrix stiffness, stress relaxation, the mobility of adhesion ligands and the ability of these ligands to support cellular forces. In this work we designed a hydrogel platform consisting of interpenetrating polymer networks of covalently crosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and self-assembled peptide amphiphiles (PA). We can tailor the storage modulus of the hydrogel by altering the concentration and composition of each network, and we can tune the stress relaxation half-life through the non-covalent bonding in the PA network. Ligand mobility can be adjusted independently of the matrix mechanical properties by attaching the RGD cell adhesion ligand to either the covalent PEG network, the dynamic PA network, or both networks at once. Interestingly, our findings show that endothelial cell adhesion formation and spreading is maximized in soft, viscoelastic gels in which RGD adhesion ligands are present on both the covalent PEG and non-covalent PA networks. The dynamic nature of cell adhesion domains, coupled with their ability to exert substantial forces on the matrix, suggests that having different presentations of RGD ligands which are either mobile or are capable of withstanding significant forces are needed mimic different aspects of complex cell-matrix adhesions. By demonstrating how different presentations of RGD ligands affect cell behavior independently of viscoelastic properties, these results contribute to the rational design of hydrogels that facilitate desired cell-matrix interactions, with the potential of improving
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.