ReviewSleep medicine: X2024
Comorbidity of obstructive sleep apnea and narcolepsy: A challenging diagnosis and complex management.
Review in Sleep medicine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleep-disordered breathing and psychiatric comorbidities in narcolepsy: A 10-year retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.Sleep medicine: X · 2026Article
- Adipsic hypernatremia associated with hypothalamic dysfunction and sleep disorders.JCEM case reports · 2026Article
- Therapeutic potential of targeting the orexin (hypocretin) system in sleep disorders.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Narcolepsy: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions, a Narrative Review.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Case Report: Narcolepsy patients masked behind obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS): report of 2 cases and literature review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Factors Associated with Rapid Eye Movement-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Narcolepsy.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) are relevant causes of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS); although different for etiopathogenesis and symptoms, differential diagnosis is sometimes difficult, and guidelines are lacking concerning their management when coexisting in a same patient. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was realized including PubMed, Scopus and Embase, aimed to regroup studies and case reports evaluating epidemiology, clinical and instrumental features and treatment of patients presenting comorbid NT1 and OSA. Moreover, a snowball search on the pathophysiology underpinnings of the association of the two disorder was realized. Results: For adults, the prevalence of OSA in NT1 ranged from 24.8 % to 51.4 %. No studies were found concerning the treatment of EDS in double-diagnosis patients, but only case reports; these latter and the experience on patients with either NT or OSA suggest that modafinil, methylphenidate, pitolisant and solriamfetol are effective. Discussion: Adults with NT1 showed a higher prevalence of OSA compared to the general population, but the reach of the results reviewed here is limited by the retrospective design of most of the studies and by the inhomogeneous utilization of diagnostic criteria. The association with OSA is likely to be explained by the involvement of orexin in hypercapnic-hypoxic responses: a deficit of orexin may promote obstructive events during sleep. Open questions warrant further investigation, especially orexin's involvement in other sleep disorders associated with EDS, and the more appropriate treatment for the OSA-narcolepsy comorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.