Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386306›Full record

ReviewSkin appendage disorders2024

Pediatric Nail Disorders.

Stephano Cedirian, Aurora Alessandrini, Michela V R Starace

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skin appendage disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephano CedirianDermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Aurora AlessandriniDermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Michela V R StaraceDermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pediatric nail disorders encompass a broad range of conditions. This article aimed to consolidate current knowledge on pediatric nail disorders to enhance diagnostic proficiency and clinical management among healthcare professionals. Summary: Pediatric nail disorders present a diagnostic challenge due to their diverse nature. Non-syndromic congenital nail disorders encompass various anomalies such as anonychia/hyponychia, congenital malalignment of the great toenail, and racket thumbs, each with distinct clinical presentations and genetic associations. Syndromic congenital nail disorders, often part of complex syndromes, are characterized by unique features and associated abnormalities. Acquired nail diseases in children, like Beau's lines and onychomadesis, typically result from trauma or infection, while melanonychia, although rare in children, requires careful monitoring for potential malignant alterations, with consideration for biopsy in cases with concerning features. Key Messages: (1) Pediatric nail disorders may pose diagnostic challenges and require a comprehensive understanding of nail anatomy and development. (2) Congenital nail disorders encompass isolated anomalies and syndromic associations, necessitating thorough evaluation for associated systemic conditions. (3) Acquired nail diseases may indicate underlying trauma or systemic illness and require careful assessment.(4) Melanonychia in children requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation, emphasizing the importance of consistent follow-up and histopathological examination when necessary.

Indexed as

KoilonychiaMelanonychiaNail infectionsNon-syndromic congenital disordersPediatric nail disordersSyndromic congenital nail disorders

Identifiers

PMID39386306
PMCPMC11460841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.