ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024
Neuromodulation effect of temporal interference stimulation based on network computational model.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on neurophysiologic motor function in Parkinson's patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Temporal Interference Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Produces Frequency-Dependent Analgesia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Temporal interference stimulation of peripheral nerves induces functionally diverse limb movements revealed by automated pose estimation and unsupervised behavioral analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Human Applications of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation: A Systematic Review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Temporal interference stimulation over the motor cortex enhances cortical excitability in rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Beyond the surface: a review of transcranial temporal interference stimulation for deep brain modulation.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- The effects of amplitude modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation on working memory of college students.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has long been the conventional method for targeting deep brain structures, but noninvasive alternatives like transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIS) are gaining traction. Research has shown that alternating current influences brain oscillations through neural modulation. Understanding how neurons respond to the stimulus envelope, particularly considering tTIS's high-frequency carrier, is vital for elucidating its mechanism of neuronal engagement. This study aims to explore the focal effects of tTIS across varying amplitudes and modulation depths in different brain regions. An excitatory-inhibitory network using the Izhikevich neuron model was employed to investigate responses to tTIS and compare them with transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS). We utilized a multi-scale model that integrates brain tissue modeling and network computational modeling to gain insights into the neuromodulatory effects of tTIS on the human brain. By analyzing the parametric space, we delved into phase, amplitude, and frequency entrainment to elucidate how tTIS modulates endogenous alpha oscillations. Our findings highlight a significant difference in current intensity requirements between tTIS and tACS, with tTIS requiring notably higher intensity. We observed distinct network entrainment patterns, primarily due to tTIS's high-frequency component, whereas tACS exhibited harmonic entrainment that tTIS lacked. Spatial resolution analysis of tTIS, conducted via computational modeling and brain field distribution at a 13 Hz stimulation frequency, revealed modulation in deep brain areas, with minimal effects on the surface. Notably, we observed increased power within intrinsic and stimulation bands beneath the electrodes, attributed to the high stimulus signal amplitude. Additionally, Phase Locking Value (PLV) showed slight increments in non-deep areas. Our analysis indicates focal stimulation using tTIS, prompting further investigation into the necessity of high amplitudes to significantly affect deep brain regions, which warrants validation through clinical experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.