Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386226›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024

The Utility of Speckle Tracking Echocardiographic Parameters in Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Decai Zeng, Linyan Li, Shuai Chang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Yanfen Zhong, Yongzhi Cai, Tongtong Huang, Ji Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Echocardiographic strain imaging and progression of atrial fibrillation in low-risk individuals.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Left Atrial Strain-Current Review of Clinical Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Decai ZengDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Linyan LiDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Shuai ChangDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
Xiaofeng ZhangDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-3286
Yanfen ZhongDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9424-744X
Yongzhi CaiDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-3828
Tongtong HuangDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-1179
Ji WuDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) as a treatment for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), many patients still experience atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after CA. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of speckle tracking echocardiographic (STE) parameters for AF recurrence post-ablation. Methods: A total of 380 NVAF patients treated with CA at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from January 2020 to March 2023 were prospectively recruited. The mean age was 59.4 ± 10.8 years, and 72.1% were male, including 150 patients (39.5%) with persistent AF and 230 patients (60.5%) with paroxysmal AF. STE was used to evaluate baseline left atrial (LA) function before CA within 48h. Over a median follow-up of 9 (interquartile range, 4-17) months, AF recurrence occurred in 132 patients (34.7%). Results: The recurrence group showed lower left ventricular ejection fraction, LA reservoir strain (LASr), and conduit strain (LAScd), but higher LA stiffness than non- recurrence group (all Conclusion: Evaluation of LA function using STE assists in stratifying the risk of AF recurrence in NVAF patients and guiding follow-up management. LASr and LA stiffness are independent predictors of AF recurrence following CA in NVAF patients, and potentially outperforming other morphological parameters.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillation recurrencecatheter ablationnon-valvular atrial fibrillationspeckle tracking echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID39386226
PMCPMC11463183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.