ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
ASPYRE-Lung: validation of a simple, fast, robust and novel method for multi-variant genomic analysis of actionable NSCLC variants in FFPE tissue.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful simplified genomic profiling of cytology specimens using Aspyre Clinical Test for Lung (Tissue).Cancer cytopathology · 2026Article
- Enspyre: a novel enrichment technology for selected DNA variants using pyrophosphorolysis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Development of a Machine Learning Model for Aspyre Lung Blood: A New Assay for Rapid Detection of Actionable Variants From Plasma in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Analytical validation of Aspyre Clinical Test for Lung (Blood): A multiplexed PCR and pyrophosphorolysis-based assay for detecting actionable NSCLC variants in plasma cfDNA and cfRNA.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the ASPYRE-Lung targeted variant panel: a rapid, low-input solution for non-small cell lung cancer biomarker testing and experience from three independent sites.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Genomic variant testing of tumors is a critical gateway for patients to access the full potential of personalized oncology therapeutics. Current methods such as next-generation sequencing are costly and challenging to interpret, while PCR assays are limited in the number of variants they can cover. We developed ASPYRE Methods: We tested the limit of detection, specificity, analytical accuracy and analytical precision of ASPYRE-Lung using FFPE lung tissue samples from patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma, variant-negative FFPE tissue from healthy donors, and FFPE-based contrived samples with controllable variant allele fractions. Results: The sensitivity of ASPYRE-Lung was determined to be ≤ 3% variant allele fraction for single nucleotide variants and insertions or deletions, 100 copies for fusions, and 200 copies for Conclusions: The technology is simple and fast, requiring only four reagent transfer steps using standard laboratory equipment (PCR and qPCR instruments) with analysis via a cloud-based algorithm. The ASPYRE-Lung assay has the potential to be transformative in facilitating access to rapid, actionable molecular profiling of tissue for patients with non-small cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.