ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Long Term Visual Outcomes of an Extended Macular Vision IOL in Eyes with Macular Disease and Visually Insignificant Cataract.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine long-term efficacy and safety of an extended macular vision intraocular lens (IOL) implanted in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and visually insignificant cataracts. Design: Retrospective observational case series. Setting: MicroChirurgia Oculare, Italy. Methods: A retrospective case series of patients with dry AMD and visually insignificant cataracts undergoing phacoemulsification and implantation of an extended macular vision IOL designed to optimize image quality up to 10° from the foveal center (EyeMax Mono, Sharpview Ophthalmology, London, UK). Criteria for implantation were visually insignificant cataract (NC1 according to LOCS III classification) with dry age-related macular degeneration. Hypermetropia was targeted in most eyes to provide magnification when corrected with spectacles. Primary outcome measures were changes in corrected distant and secondary outcome measures included near visual acuity (CDVA and CNVA, respectively) between baseline and latest follow-up and safety outcomes. Results: 113 eyes of 86 patients (mean age 70.3±7.9 years) were included (mean follow-up: 48.3±25.1 months). Mean CDVA improved by 0.22 logMAR (11 ETDRS letters), from 0.53±0.4 to 0.31±0.3 (n=113, p<0.001). Similarly, mean CNVA improved by 0.08 logMAR (4 ETDRS letters), from 0.45±0.2 to 0.37±0.2 (n=77, p<0.001). Eleven eyes had AMD with extensive atrophy, and their mean CDVA improved by 0.32 logMAR (16 ETDRS letters). Three eyes (2.7%) experienced loss of more than one line in logMAR CDVA and four eyes (5.2%) experienced loss of more than one line in logMAR CNVA. No complications or instances of IOL exchange were reported. Conclusion: Visual improvement in eyes with visually insignificant cataract and AMD who underwent phacoemulsification and were implanted with EyeMax Mono IOL appears to be influenced by the IOL optical design. Vision enhancement in eyes with visually insignificant cataracts underscores the IOL's ability to optimize use of healthy retinal areas. Prospective studies with control groups are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.