ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Racial Disparities in Plastic Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aesthetic surgery complications in private practice settings: Insights to optimize patient access and outcomes.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- From Serum to Surgery: The Significance of Albumin in Preoperative Risk Stratification-An Analysis of 200,015 Plastic Surgery Patients.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Racial disparities in surgical outcomes have been shown to lead to subpar results in various patients. Variability and contradictions in the current literature highlight the need for a crucial evaluation of the matter in studies focusing on plastic and reconstructive surgery. Investigating the matter is a pivotal step toward effective guidelines that mitigate factors contributing to racial disparities in outcomes and improve our perception of a patient-centered health-care system. The study aimed to identify whether racial disparities exist in plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures. Methods: Systematic review of the literature as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed to find relevant articles assessing the impact of race on surgical outcomes. PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library were screened by both authors, and relevant articles were identified. Prevalence of complications were extracted from included studies, and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated and grouped for a statistical analysis. Results: Meta-analysis of 13 studies, with a mean of 8059 patients per study, demonstrated a pooled OR of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.00-1.46), indicating an insignificant association between non-White race and postoperative complications. Subanalysis comparing African American patients to White patients (10 studies) showed an OR of 1.36 (95% CI: 1.06-1.74), signifying a statistically significant risk for African Americans. No publication bias was observed, but substantial heterogeneity (73% and 79%) suggested varied study factors influencing outcomes. Conclusions: Racial disparities exist in plastic and reconstructive outcomes. Physicians and medical staff should focus on patients' sociodemographic background, accessibility to care, support cycles, and language proficiency, while determining the surgical plan and postoperative care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.