ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Technical Strategies and Learning Curve in Robotic-assisted Peripheral Nerve Surgery.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Dedicated Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery Platforms in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.Microsurgery · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Robotic Systems in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Facial Nerve Repair Using a Microsurgical Robot System: A Preclinical Study Using a Rat Model.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- The application of robot-assisted microsurgery in orthoplastic surgery.Innovative surgical sciences · 2026Article
- Advancements in robotic assisted microsurgery: Exploring the MUSA robot in reconstructive microsurgical and supermicrosurgical procedures.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Perception and Reality of Robotic Microsurgery: A Cross-sectional Comparative User and Nonuser Survey Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Robot-Assisted Microsurgery Has a Steeper Learning Curve in Microsurgical Novices.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of the Evolving Role of Robotic Surgery in Pediatrics: Innovations and Future Prospects.Cureus · 2025Review
- Use of Robotic Surgery in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Robotic microsurgery for pediatric peripheral nerve surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Learning curve of robotic assisted microsurgery in surgeons with different skill levels: a prospective preclinical study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted peripheral nerve surgery (RASPN) has emerged as a promising advancement in microsurgery, offering enhanced precision and tremor reduction for nerve coaptations. This study investigated the largest published patient collective in RASPN and provided specific technical aspects, operative setups, and a learning curve. Methods: Data collection involved creating a prospective database that recorded surgical details such as surgery type, duration, nerve coaptation time, and number of stitches. The experienced surgeon first underwent a 12-hour training program utilizing the Symani robot system in combination with optical magnification tools before using the system clinically. Results: The study included 19 patients who underwent robot-assisted peripheral nerve reconstruction. The cohort included six men (31.6%) and 13 women (68.4%), with an average age of 53.8 ± 18.4 years. The procedures included nerve transfers, targeted muscle reinnervation, neurotized free flaps, and autologous nerve grafts. Learning curve analysis revealed no significant reduction in time per stitch over the initial nine coaptations (4.9 ± 0.5 min) compared with the last 10 coaptations (5.5 ± 1.5 min). Conclusions: The learning curve for RASPN was compared with early experiences with other surgical robots, emphasizing the importance of surgical proficiency and assistant training. Obstacles such as instrument grip strength and blood clot formation were highlighted, and suggestions for future advancements were proposed. RASPN presents an exciting opportunity to enhance precision; however, ongoing research and optimization are necessary to fully harness its benefits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.