ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
The effects of social determinants of health on anterior cruciate ligament injury recovery.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disparities in ACL Injury and Management: The Impact of Sex, Race, and Social Determinants of Health.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Over 200,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries occur in the United States each year. While many patients choose to pursue ACL reconstruction (ACLR), the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on outcomes is unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to review and synthesize current literature to determine the impact of SDOH on outcomes following ACL reconstruction. Data sources: A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO, and Scopus was completed. Study selection: Articles reporting outcomes following ACLR were included if they discussed at least one SDOH and provided ACLR failure rates. Study design: Systematic review. Level of evidence: Level I. Results: After screening 712 studies, 13 were found that met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Studies commonly examined the correlations between race, income, location, education, and insurance on outcomes following ACLR. Three studies found that the ACL revision risk for Black patients compared to White patients ranged from 0.23 to 0.78, while the revision risk for Hispanic patients compared to White patients ranged from 0.7 to 0.83. One study reported finding that the odds ratio of revision for the White patients was 1.32. Another study reported no difference in revision risk based on race. Patients living in urban areas were found to have improved outcomes compared to rural areas (Mean IKDC (Urban 85.3 vs Rural 81.87) and Tegner-Lysholm (Urban 88.26 vs Rural 84.82)). Lower socioeconomic status was correlated with decreased post-operative functional scores (KOOS, Marx and IKDC). Conclusion: Several SDOH such as White race, rural location, and low socioeconomic status may be independently correlated with worse ACLR outcomes in the form of increased revision rates or worse post-operative functional scores. However, further research is needed to better elucidate the degree of impact and interconnectedness of SDOH domains on ACLR patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.