ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
An evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the triphasic bone scintigraphy in patients suspected of aseptic total knee arthroplasty loosening.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely conducted and successful orthopedic procedure. However, aseptic loosening, a common cause of TKA failure, necessitates revision surgery. Diagnostic accuracy of triphasic bone scintigraphy, a common imaging modality for aseptic loosening detection, remains controversial. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy when separately evaluated by a nuclear physicist and an orthopedic surgeon, and the interrater reliability between the two. Methods: Patients undergoing knee revision surgery due to suspected aseptic loosening at three medical centers from 2006 to 2023 were included. Relevant demographic, clinical, and procedural data were extracted from the records. The bone scintigraphy results as noted by the nuclear physicist and orthopedic surgeon were used as index test and intraoperative findings of loosening were used as reference tests. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and kappa's agreement was assessed. Results: Out of 611 revision TKAs, 59 cases were analyzed. The nuclear physicist's evaluation of bone scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 73 %, specificity of 0 %, positive predictive value of 93 %, negative predictive value of 0 %, and diagnostic accuracy of 69 %. The orthopedic surgeon's evaluation showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and an accuracy of 84 %. Agreement levels were moderate (kappa = 0.46) between the nuclear physicist's and orthopedic surgeons evaluation. Interpretation: The diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy for aseptic loosening is 84 % when evaluated by the orthopedic surgeon compared to 69 % for the nuclear physicist's evaluation. Kappa's agreement between the two was moderate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.