Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386060›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024

A phase I clinical trial evaluating the application of hydrogel in reducing rectal dose during cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Yuxuan Wang, Hongnan Zhen, Ke Hu, Lang Yu, Jie Zhang, Chunli Luo, Lihua Yu, Junfang Yan, Fuquan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Role of rectal spacers in gynecological cancer radiotherapy: reducing rectal dose and treatment-related toxicity.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuxuan WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hongnan ZhenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ke HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lang YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chunli LuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lihua YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Junfang YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fuquan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study represents a prospective phase I clinical research to verify the effectiveness and reliability of hydrogel application in Chinese cervical cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Eight patients were enrolled in the study. After completing intensity-modulated radiotherapy at 50.4 Gy/28 fractions, a 10 mL injection of hydrogel was administered to each patient through the posterior vaginal fornix under CT-guidance. Image-guided brachytherapy under CT or MRI guidance was given with a target dose of 6 Gy in 5 fractions to the high-risk clinical target volume. Rectal, sigmoid colon, and bladder D2cm3 were recorded for each brachytherapy. MRI scans were performed to measure the distance between the rectum and the cervix or tumor, as well as the spacer gel volume. Patients' QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24 scores were recorded to assess treatment outcomes, and all adverse events were documented. Results: Among the eight patients, the average D2cc was 60.9 ± 3.4 Gy for the rectum, 64.7 ± 6.8 Gy for sigmoid colon and 77.1 ± 7.4 Gy for bladder, respectively. The distance between the cervix and rectum significantly increased after gel injection. None of the eight patients experienced grade 3 or higher acute toxic reactions during brachytherapy. None patient experienced late rectal toxicity. No adverse events definitively associated with the hydrogel were observed. Patients' subjective quality of life scores did not significantly change before and after gel injection. The reduction ro the volume of the hydrogel were observed during the 24 to 36  weeks after injection. Conclusion: The application of the hydrogel effectively increased the distance between the cervix and rectum in brachytherapy for cervical cancer, limiting the rectal dose without increasing doses to other critical organs. In the short term, no severe adverse events were observed, indicating the safety and reliability of this approach. Further research is warranted to confirm its long-term safety and effectiveness.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerHydrogel spacerImage-guided brachytherapyRadiation-induced rectal injury

Identifiers

PMID39386060
PMCPMC11462166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.