Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39386019›Full record

ArticleHepatology forum2024

An alternative method in the diagnosis of intrabiliary lesions: Percutaneous endobiliary brush biopsy.

Mustafa Ozdemir, Tunahan Dertli, Omer Faruk Sevinc, Onur Taydas, Gurkan Danisan, Omer Faruk Ates, Mehmet Halil Ozturk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mustafa OzdemirDepartment of Radiology, Sakarya University School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkiye.
Tunahan DertliDepartment of Radiology, Sakarya University School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkiye.
Omer Faruk SevincDepartment of Radiology, Kocaeli City Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkiye.
Onur TaydasDepartment of Radiology, Sakarya University School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkiye.
Gurkan DanisanDepartment of Radiology, Sakarya University School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkiye.
Omer Faruk AtesDepartment of Radiology, Sakarya University School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkiye.
Mehmet Halil OzturkDepartment of Radiology, Sakarya University School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Biliary strictures can occur as a result of various benign or malignant processes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of percutaneous endobiliary brush biopsy in the diagnosis of intrabiliary lesions. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted between January 2022 and April 2023, involving a total of 16 patients. Of the patients, 10 were male (62.5%), and 6 were female (37.5%). The average age of the patients was 68.1±8. All patients underwent the procedure using an endobiliary biopsy brush under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance. Results: Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). Cell detection was not observed in biopsy samples from 2 patients (12.5%), resulting in a diagnostic success rate of 87.5%. Access was made to the right biliary system in 14 patients (87.5%) and to the left biliary system in 2 patients (12.5%). Biopsy locations included the common bile duct in 12 patients (75%), hepatic hilum in 2 patients (12.5%), and bilioenteric anastomosis line in 2 patients (12.5%). The mean fluoroscopy time was 16.2±7.1 minutes. The average radiation dose was 660±370 mSv. Pathological diagnosis revealed malignancy in 8 patients (50%) and benign findings in 6 patients (37.5%). Liver abscess requiring drainage developed in 2 patients (12.5%). Conclusion: Percutaneous endobiliary brush biopsy performed under imaging guidance is an effective and reliable method for the diagnosis of biliary lesions.

Indexed as

biliary strictureBrush biopsycholestasisinterventional radiology

Identifiers

PMID39386019
PMCPMC11440218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.