ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Machine learning models for mortality prediction in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis-associated acute kidney injury.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive models for acute kidney injury in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Development and external evaluation of an interpretable machine-learning model for early prediction of organ failure in higher-risk acute pancreatitis patients: A multicentre cohort study.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting chronic critical illness in ICU patients with acute pancreatitis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Prediction of acute postoperative protein depletion risk in colon cancer using an in-context learning foundation model: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Decoding dynamic lipase trajectory patterns and in-hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis: insights from machine learning in intensive care units.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was associated with an increased mortality rate among acute pancreatitis (AP) patients, indicating the importance of accurately predicting the mortality rate of critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis-associated acute kidney injury (AP-AKI) at an early stage. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning-based predictive models for in-hospital mortality rate in critically ill patients with AP-AKI by comparing their performance with the traditional logistic regression (LR) model. Methods: This study used data from three clinical databases. The predictors were identified by the Recursive Feature Elimination algorithm. The LR and two machine learning models-random forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-were developed using 10-fold cross-validation to predict in-hospital mortality rate in AP-AKI patients. Results: A total of 1089 patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) were included in the training set and 176 patients from Xiangya Hospital were included in the external validation set. The in-hospital mortality rates of the training and external validation sets were 13.77% and 54.55%, respectively. Compared with the area under the curve (AUC) values of the LR model and the RF model, the AUC value of the XGBoost model {0.941 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.931-0.952]} was significantly higher (both Conclusions: The XGBoost model was superior to the LR and RF models in terms of both the discrimination and calibration in the training set. Whether the findings can be generalized needs to be further validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.