ArticleMethodsX2024
The use of Shewhart control charts when conducting cavitation studies to identify and eliminate non-random causes of variability.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the processes that accompanies the operation of various hydraulic systems is cavitation. This phenomenon is often accompanied by cavitation erosion, that is, the progressive loss of parent material from a solid surface due to continued exposure. The problem of obtaining accurate and reliable data when conducting cavitation studies remains relevant. This article discusses the adaptation of the use of Shewhart control charts when conducting cavitation studies, in order to determine the presence of non-random "special" causes of variability. A graph of changes in the process parameters over time was constructed to carry out statistical control of the stability of the process in order to determine the boundaries of the system variability of the process in order to predict the behavior of the process. As a result of the conducted research, recommendations were developed to increase the accuracy of output data when conducting cavitation studies. It has been confirmed that the use of control charts as a tool for quality control of laboratory measurements allows us to establish that the process has achieved a statistically controlled state, which allows us to maintain a high degree of stability and quality of the research being carried out. This method makes it possible:•to determine the presence of non-random "special" causes of variability during cavitation studies.•to quickly identify and eliminate the "special" causes of variability during cavitation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.