ReviewCureus2024
Autologous Conditioned Serum in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Orthobiologics are not all the same: a mechanism-based scoping review of PRP, cytokine-rich serum, and extracellular vesicle-based strategies in musculoskeletal conditions.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Toward Personalized ACS Therapy: How Disease Status and Patient Lifestyle Shape the Molecular Signature of Autologous Conditioned Serum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of minimally invasive procedures in musculoskeletal diseases-Part II.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular mediators of motion: RNA-RBP networks in exercise-induced osteoarthritis protection.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Conditioned plasma promotes full-thickness skin defect healing in a rat model.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Orthobiologics for the Management of Elbow Disorders: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Orthobiologics for the Management of Shoulder Disorders: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence powers regenerative medicine into predictive realm.Regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Gold-Induced Cytokine (GOLDIC) for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) significantly impacts global health, causing pain, disability, and socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatments often provide only temporary relief and can have adverse effects. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) therapy, which enriches a patient's own blood with growth factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines, has emerged as a promising approach to manage knee OA, potentially offering pain reduction, improved function, and tissue regeneration. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane using terms like "Autologous Conditioned Serum" and "knee osteoarthritis." Clinical studies were selected based on their focus on ACS's efficacy in knee OA, assessing outcomes like pain relief, functional improvement, and adverse events. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and comparative analyses. The review included a wide range of study designs and outcomes, highlighting ACS's efficacy in reducing pain and enhancing knee function as evidenced by various patient-reported outcome measures Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS) with a follow-up of up to 11 years (range: 2-11 years). Comparative studies showed ACS to be as effective or superior to conventional treatments such as platelet-rich plasma, steroids, and hyaluronic acid, especially in cases of moderate synovitis. Minimal adverse effects such as peri-injection pain, rigidity, synovitis, transient sensation of redness/heat, and numbness in the knee/leg/toes were reported, underscoring ACS's safety. Some studies suggested ACS might also have disease-modifying effects, contributing to tissue repair and integrity. ACS therapy offers a promising alternative for knee OA management, demonstrating potential benefits in symptom alleviation, functional improvement, and safety. Indications of disease-modifying properties further highlight its therapeutic value. However, the need for standardized formulations and treatment protocols, long-term studies, and mechanistic understanding remain. Future research should focus on addressing these gaps to fully elucidate ACS's role in the treatment landscape of knee OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.