ArticleTranslational medicine @ UniSa2024
Instrumental Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta and Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes: Literature Review and Observational Study.
Article in Translational medicine @ UniSa, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Interventional Radiology in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gynecological Conditions.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Surgical Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Five-Year Institutional Experience.Cureus · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Value of Combined MRI and Ultrasound Features in Invasive Placenta Accreta and Prediction of Adverse Outcomes.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- PAS or Not PAS? The Sonographic Assessment of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders and the Clinical Validation of a New Diagnostic and Prognostic Scoring System.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Placenta accreta (PA) is a condition where the placenta is pathologically adherent to the uterus due to a defect in the basal decidua with myometrium invasion by chorionic villi and is classified based on the depth of myometrial invasion by histology. However, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have excellent accuracy. In this study, we investigated clinical benefits of early instrumental diagnosis of PA, especially in reducing maternal-fetal complications and improving perinatal outcomes. We also evaluated diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging on placental invasiveness assessment. Methods: In this review and observational retrospective study, risk factors of PA were collected, and pregnant women underwent third-trimester ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the degree of infiltration. Imaging results compared to histological findings and surgical evaluation. Results: A total of 38 patients were diagnosed with at the University Hospital "San Giovanni di Dio and Ruggi d'Aragona", Salerno, Italy, by second-trimester ultrasound with high sensitivity (100%) and accuracy (86%). Moreover, 37 of them performed MRI and 60.5% were diagnosed with Accreta, 7.9% increta, 10.5% percreta, and 21.1% not accrue with high sensitivity (100%), specificity (88.9%), and accuracy (97.4%). Histological assay confirmed MRI findings in 96.7% of cases. Risk factors of PA were age >35 years and previous CT scans. In unborn babies, mean 1-min Apgar was 4.3 (range, 3-6), and mean 5-min Apgar was 7.13 (range, 7-9). Conclusion: MRI could be a not-invasive, specific, sensitive, and accurate diagnostic tool for assessing the degree of infiltration in PA, and could guide clinical decisions, such as delivery plan, thus reducing perioperative and fetal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.