ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2024
Stylet-driven Leads or Lumenless Leads for Conduction System Pacing.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conduction System vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure: The PhysioSync-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2026Trial
- Late Fracture of Stylet-driven Lead Intended for Conduction System Pacing 2 Years After Implant.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026Article
- Conduction System Pacing Leads: Lumenless versus Stylet-driven Technologies in Contemporary Practice.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026Review
- Continuous Pacing and Recording Technique: A Real-Time Feedback Approach for Left Bundle Branch Pacing.CJC open · 2025Review
- Outcomes of stylet-driven leads compared to lumenless leads for left bundle branch are pacing: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- Helix Retraction of Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads with Extendable Helix Used for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing.Chonnam medical journal · 2025Article
- Riding the Highs and Lows of the Conduction System Pacing Wave-Our Experience.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stylet-driven leads have been recently introduced for conduction system pacing, while most of the previous experience has been obtained with lumenless leads. Design and structural characteristics of both lead types are significantly different, resulting in different implant techniques and independent learning curves. Lead performance appears to be comparable, whereas data on direct comparison of clinical outcomes are scarce. Currently, there are no specific clinical scenarios favouring the use of one lead type over another and the decision should rely on the individual experience of the implanter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.