Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385758›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2024

Rating pome fruit quality traits using deep learning and image processing.

Nhan H Nguyen, Joseph Michaud, Rene Mogollon, Huiting Zhang, Heidi Hargarten, Rachel Leisso, Carolina A Torres, Loren Honaas, Stephen Ficklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nhan H NguyenDepartment of Horticulture Washington State University Pullman WA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6899-3309
Joseph MichaudAgricultural Research Service, Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research Unit - Hood River Worksite USDA Hood River OR USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0690-6618
Rene MogollonDepartment of Horticulture Washington State University Pullman WA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9148-6031
Huiting ZhangDepartment of Horticulture Washington State University Pullman WA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1741-9492
Heidi HargartenAgricultural Research Service, Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research Unit USDA Wenatchee WA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-1323
Rachel LeissoAgricultural Research Service, Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research Unit - Hood River Worksite USDA Hood River OR USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-3684
Carolina A TorresDepartment of Horticulture Washington State University Pullman WA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5121-7371
Loren HonaasAgricultural Research Service, Physiology and Pathology of Tree Fruits Research Unit USDA Wenatchee WA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-8254
Stephen FicklinDepartment of Horticulture Washington State University Pullman WA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9138-6292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality assessment of pome fruits (i.e. apples and pears) is used not only for determining the optimal harvest time but also for the progression of fruit-quality attributes during storage. Therefore, it is typical to repeatedly evaluate fruits during the course of a postharvest experiment. This evaluation often includes careful visual assessments of fruit for apparent defects and physiological symptoms. A general best practice for quality assessment is to rate fruit using the same individual rater or group of individual raters to reduce bias. However, such consistency across labs, facilities, and experiments is often not feasible or attainable. Moreover, while these visual assessments are critical empirical data, they are often coarse-grained and lack consistent objective criteria. Granny, is a tool designed for rating fruit using machine-learning and image-processing to address rater bias and improve resolution. Additionally, Granny supports backward compatibility by providing ratings compatible with long-established standards and references, promoting research program continuity. Current Granny ratings include starch content assessment, rating levels of peel defects, and peel color analyses. Integrative analyses enhanced by Granny's improved resolution and reduced bias, such as linking fruit outcomes to global scale -omics data, environmental changes, and other quantitative fruit quality metrics like soluble solids content and flesh firmness, will further enrich our understanding of fruit quality dynamics. Lastly, Granny is open-source and freely available.

Indexed as

machine learningpome fruittrait prediction

Identifiers

PMID39385758
PMCPMC11461139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.