Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385639›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2025

Public engagement with consumer sleep technology for obstructive sleep apnea screening: implications for equity, access, and practice.

Nicholas R Lenze, Ruby J Kazemi, Allison K Ikeda, Punithavathy Vijayakumar, Cathy A Goldstein, Jeffrey J Stanley, Michael J Brenner, Paul T Hoff

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicholas R LenzeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ruby J KazemiDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Allison K IkedaDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Punithavathy VijayakumarSleep Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Cathy A GoldsteinSleep Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jeffrey J StanleyDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Michael J BrennerDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Paul T HoffDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Michigan Otolaryngology Research Education (MORE)R25DC020262 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Gabriel Corfas · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R25 DC020262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo characterize public practices and perspectives on the use of consumer sleep technology (CST) and evaluate perspectives on using CST as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea.

methodsWe designed a survey instrument incorporating content from validated instruments (STOP-Bang and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale) and hypothesis-generated questions. Survey development involved multidisciplinary collaboration among 3 board-certified sleep medicine experts, researchers, and consumers. The survey was disseminated across a national sample of adults living in the United States via an online platform.

resultsAmong 897 respondents, the mean (standard deviation) age was 47.5 (16.9) years; 73.1% were female, 81.8% were White, and 505 respondents (56.3%) reported having tracked sleep using CST. Factors associated with decreased odds of CST use included household income < $30,000 (odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.79;

conclusionsAttitudes toward and use of CST differed based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. Further study is needed to understand and address barriers to CST adoption and to characterize implications for equitable access to care for sleep disorders. CITATION: Lenze NR, Kazemi RJ, Ikeda AK, et al. Public engagement with consumer sleep technology for obstructive sleep apnea screening: implications for equity, access, and practice.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth Services AccessibilityMass ScreeningSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesconsumer sleep technologyhealth disparitieshealth equityobstructive sleep apneascreeningsleep disorderssleep-trackingsocioeconomic factorssurveys and questionnaireswearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID39385639
PMCPMC11789253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.