Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39385391›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025

Self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI using blind source separation for automated cardiac motion extraction.

Isabel Montón Quesada, Augustin C Ogier, Masaki Ishida, Masafumi Takafuji, Haruno Ito, Hajime Sakuma, Ludovica Romanin, Christopher W Roy, Milan Prša, Jonas Richiardi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cardiac function assessment with deep-learning-based automatic segmentation of free-running four-dimensional whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Isabel Montón QuesadaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-0585-4391
Augustin C OgierDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9178-9964
Masaki IshidaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan.
Masafumi TakafujiDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan.
Haruno ItoDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan.
Hajime SakumaDepartment of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan.
Ludovica RomaninDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5031-3302
Christopher W RoyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3111-8840
Milan PršaWoman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9483-7957
Jonas RichiardiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jérôme YerlyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4347-8613
Matthias StuberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ruud B van HeeswijkDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5028-4521

Funding

Schweizerische Herzstiftung FF23129Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_215604Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 320030B_201292Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 32003B_182615Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PZ00P3_202140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare two blind source separation (BSS) techniques to principal component analysis and the electrocardiogram for the identification of cardiac triggers in self-gated free-running 5D whole-heart MRI. To ascertain the precision and robustness of the techniques, they were compared in three different noise and contrast regimes.

methodsThe repeated superior-inferior (SI) projections of a 3D radial trajectory were used to extract the physiological signals in three cardiac MRI cohorts: (1) 9 healthy volunteers without contrast agent injection at 1.5T, (2) 30 ferumoxytol-injected congenital heart disease patients at 1.5T, and (3) 12 gadobutrol-injected patients with suspected coronary artery disease at 3T. Self-gated cardiac triggers were extracted with the three algorithms (principal component analysis [PCA], second-order blind identification [SOBI], and independent component analysis [ICA]) and the difference with the electrocardiogram triggers was calculated. PCA and SOBI triggers were retained for image reconstruction. The image sharpness was ascertained on whole-heart 5D images obtained with PCA and SOBI and compared among the three cohorts.

resultsSOBI resulted in smaller trigger differences in Cohorts 1 and 3 compared to PCA (p < 0.01) and in all cohorts compared to ICA (p < 0.04). In Cohorts 1 and 3, the sharpness increased significantly in the reconstructed images when using SOBI instead of PCA (p < 0.03), but not in Cohort 2 (p = 0.4).

conclusionWe have shown that SOBI results in more precisely extracted self-gated triggers than PCA and ICA. The validation across three diverse cohorts demonstrates the robustness of the method against acquisition variability.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHeartPrincipal Component AnalysisAdultCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesContrast MediaCoronary Artery DiseaseElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleContrast Media5D whole‐heart cardiovascular MRIblind source separationcardiac motion extractionfree‐runningself‐gating

Identifiers

PMID39385391
PMCPMC11680725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.